This blog has focused on the ankle replacement, but I actually had two separate procedures. Dr. Nunley explained that the ankle replacement would not alleviate all of the arthritic pain: I also needed a simultaneous subtalar arthrodesis. Since I didn't know what either subtalar nor arthrodesis meant, I was satisfied with his brief explanation that by fusing some of the joints in the back of the foot, I would have less pain. That was good enough for me.
Now that I am home and recovering, I started to wonder a little more about this second surgery. First of all, it is another incision. Arthrodesis is the surgical immobilization of a joint by fusing adjacent bones. In this case, the subtalar joint is fused just below the ankle joint between the talus and the heel (or calcaneus) bone.
Now that I am home and recovering, I started to wonder a little more about this second surgery. First of all, it is another incision. Arthrodesis is the surgical immobilization of a joint by fusing adjacent bones. In this case, the subtalar joint is fused just below the ankle joint between the talus and the heel (or calcaneus) bone.
- Dr. Nunley assured me that the fusion would not affect the movement of my ankle; with both the ankle replacement and the fusion I would maintain full and natural motion of my foot.Since both surgeries were done at once, I can recover from both simultaneously. The post-surgical recovery plan is the same for both -- casting followed by a boot, pain medication, no weight bearing for 3-5 weeks and then minimal for a few months, or until the individual is able to walk without any pain. According to the research I did online, the fusion might stiffen the the hind foot, what patients lose in motion, they usually make up in pain relief and stability in walking. I might need to get used to walking on uneven surfaces, "but most patients have such improved function that they would do the procedure again." That is a pretty good endorsement.

Comments
Post a Comment